Itta/112/2022 Of Gemini Film Circuit v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
04 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/112/2022 Of Gemini Film Circuit v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
04 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/112/2022 Of Gemini Film Circuit v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NOi 112 OF 2022
Appeal Under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 against the [order]dated 07.03.2014 in l.T.A.No.315lHydl2013 [(Assessment Year 2008-O9) ][on ][the ][file]of the Court of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad Bench "B" Hyderabad]preferred against the order dated 30.01.2013 in 1.T.A.No.o139/C|T(A)-U, Hydl2OlO-11 on the file of the Court of the Commissioner of lncome [Tax ][(Appeals)-ll]Hyderabad [preferred ]against the order of the Deputy [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax,]Circle-13(1), Hyderabad dated 30-12-2010 [in PAN ][No. ][AAFFG 4152N.]
Between:
Gemini Film Circuit, Rep. by its Partner, Mr. A. [Manohar Prasad]
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT
AND
The Dy. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 13(1), [Hyderabad.]
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. RAGHU GURRAM
Counsel for the Respondents: M/s AQUITASJURIES,J V PRASAD [(Senior ] FOR TNCOME TAX)
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAIU KOSEY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
I.T.T.A.No.112 of 2o22
JUDGMTNT[(per ]Hon'ble Si.lustrce P.SAM KOSHY)
Mr. Raghu Gurram, learned counsel appearing for theappellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present
appeal.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There
shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha1lstand closed.
SD/- K.SRINIVASA RAOJorNrF\G|9rRAR\ V),'
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Deputy Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax, ][Circle ][13( 1), ][Hyderabad.]
2. One CC to SRl. AEQUITASJURIS [FIRM, ][Advocate ]
3. One CC to SRl. [GURRAw, Advocate ]
4. One CC to SRI J V [PRASAD, Senior SC FOR INCOME ]
5. Two CD Copies
prg
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0410112024
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.112 of 2022
DISMISSING THE ITTAAS WITHDRAWN
P"ri'ilI+b[il]
1[e srArG](,or)[ 7 [riB ][202[]a*. l'i.Dnrr:^*(-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.