Itta/113/2003 Of Sri Y.rathiesh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
High Court
10 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/113/2003 Of Sri Y.rathiesh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
10 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/113/2003 Of Sri Y.rathiesh v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
I.T.T.A.Nos.113, 115 & 158 of 2003
COMMON JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice L.NarasimhaReddy)
These appeals, under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act,arise out of a common order, dated 09.11.2001, passed by theVisakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal inI.T.A.Nos.2255, 2258 & 2256/Hyd/1996.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned SeniorStanding Counsel for the respondent.
An identical issue that falls for consideration in this batch ofappeals was dealt with by us in I.T.A.Nos.52 and 54 of 2002, dated06.08.2014, incidentally are filed by this very appellant. We partlyallowed those appeals.
Following the same, we partly allow the appeals, holding thatthe appellant cannot be permitted to give credit to the amountrepresenting TDS, as tax, and on the other hand, it shall be treatedas an item of income for the concerned assessment year. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall alsostand disposed of.
____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J.
_____________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.