Itta/115/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Pcl International Lenhydro Consortium Jv
High Court
25 Feb 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/115/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Pcl International Lenhydro Consortium Jv
Date of order
25 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/115/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Pcl International Lenhydro Consortium Jv, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 115 of 2014
Date: 25.02.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
M/s. PCL Intertech Lenhydro Consortium JV,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 115 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We are not inclined to admit this appeal, as the learned Tribunalon fact found that the demand notice was not issued. We record thefindings of the learned Tribunal as follows:
“In the absence of any evidence to indicate that theassessment orders were ever issued to the assessee earlier, andobserving that the demand notice in terms of S.156 was served onthe assessee only on 29.12.2008, the CIT(A) held the assessmentsfor the years under appeal to be barred by limitation in terms of S.153of the Act.”
In view of the aforesaid factual findings, we think that thedecision of the learned Tribunal is correct. Therefore, we are notinclined to interfere with the same.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
___________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.