Itta/1/2019 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo Pvt Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:1 OF 2019 Appeal under section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, [.1961 ]against orderdated 08.06.2018 in ITA No.1742tHydl2O17 ( Assessment year 20.14-20.15 on) the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad B Bench, Hyderabaddated 08.06.2018 in ITA No.1742tHydl2O17 ( Assessment year 20.14-20.15 on) the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad B Bench, Hyderabadpreferred against the order dated 29-06-2011 in l.A.No. 0414 t 2016 -17 on the fileof the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) -2, Hyderabad preferred againstthe order of the lncome Tax Officer, \Nard -2 (2) , Hyderabad Dated 26_12_2016the order of the lncome Tax Officer, \Nard -2 (2) , Hyderabad Dated 26_12_2016in PAN / GIR No. AACCC961 1N Between: Pr. Commissioner Of lncome Tax-2, Hyderabad .APPELLANT/ Appellant AND M/s. Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo Pvt Ltd, Air Cargo Terminal, Rajiv Gandhilnternational Airport, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy Djstrict ...RESPONDENT/ Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. . K. MAMATA DHOUDARY Senior SC for lTDept. Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPATLI NANDA ITTA No.1 of 2Ol9 JUDGMENT: eer he Hotl'bte the Ctlief Justice ujjar Bhu1clnl Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, learned SeniorStancling Counsel for [ncome Tax Department appearingfor the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learnedcounsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated08.06.20 18 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hyderabad Bench ts', Hyderabad inI.T.A No. 17a2/Hyd/2Ol7 for the assessmentyear 20l4-15. 3. The appeal rnas admitted for hearing on 24.O1.2O19. 4. Today' Iearned counsel for the appellant submits thaton a: application filed by the respondent under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishq,as Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has beensettlr:d betu,een the parties following which full and linal settlement dues have been paid by the respondent.Therefore, appellant would like to withdra\", the appeal. 5. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed onwithdrawal. 6 . Miscellaneous applications pending, if arry, shallstand closed. However, there shall be no order [as ][to ][costs.] SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY//fl.v-J,-^ [l{-]SECTION OFFICER To1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal [Hyderabad ] [Bench, Hyderabad]2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax [( ][Appeals ]) [-2, ][Hyderabad]3.The lncome Tax Officer, Ward [-2 ][(2), ][Hyderabad]4.One CC to Ms. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, [SC. ][IT.DEPT. ][OPUCI5.One CC to SRl. CHALLA GUNARANJAN [Advocate ] 6.Two CD Copies7.One Spare Copy1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal [Hyderabad ] [Bench, Hyderabad]2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax [( ][Appeals ]) [-2, ][Hyderabad]3.The lncome Tax Officer, Ward [-2 ][(2), ][Hyderabad]4.One CC to Ms. K. MAMATA CHOUDARY, [SC. ][IT.DEPT. ][OPUCI5.One CC to SRl. CHALLA GUNARANJAN [Advocate ] 6.Two CD Copies7.One Spare Copy t\$, I HIGH COURT DATED:1 110712022 ORDEIRlTTA.hlo.l of 2019 DTSMISSING TTIE ITTA AS \\'ITHDRAWN. b-\ ffin'"'o721 sEP ?0[