Itta/121/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/121/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2002-2003
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/121/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as u,ithdrawnwith liberty to approach this Cour-t if there is no settlement under the saidAct.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
LT.T.A. NO: 121 OF 2012
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad [Bench ]['A' ][Hyderabad in ] No.1655/Hyd/2008 for Assessment Year 2002-2003 dated [30112110 ][preferred against]the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals-lll, [Hyderabad preferred against]the Order of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome [Tax ]Circle [-2(3) ] No. G 138 daled 20112107
Between:
Global EnergyConsulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd., 6-3-570/1 , Diamond Block, [Roackdale]Com [pou ]nd,Somajiguda, Hyderabad -50002
...A',ELLANT
AND
Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle- 2 [(3) ]lncome [Tax ][Towers, A.C.Guards,]HYderabad
...RESP.NDENT
For the Appellant : Dr. P.B.VIJAYA KUMAR, [Advocate]For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SHARMA, [Advocate]
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDI{A RAO
ANI)
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICII T.VINOD KI-]MAII
I.T.1'.A. No.l2l OF 2012
JUDGMENT i [(Per ]Sri Justice ,\4 S.Ronaclwttlro lluo)
Learned counsel tbr the appellant l.ras a filed a letter seekingwithdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellant wishes to availthe benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020,,introduced by the Central Government.
2. In that view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as u,ithdrawnwith liberty to approach this Cour-t if there is no settlement under the saidAct. No costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
dismissed.
Sd/.K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARt rr/SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
To'1 . The lncome-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad2. One CC to Dr. P.B.Vijaya Kumar, Adv6cate (OpUC)3. One CC to Sri B.Narasimha Sharma, Advocite (OdUC)4. Two CD CopiesKj.+-
HIGH COURTDATED:241A312021
1HcS7A+r)[o]12APH 2O2IpORDERlTTA.No.121 [ot ][2012]t'.k,-l'r. [-r ]r,, [-. ]a'.r''
DSD. AS [ITTA.]
W
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.