Case LawHigh Court › Itta/12/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Inco...

Itta/12/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rahaman Khan Tobacco Enterprises Private Limited

High Court 21 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/12/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rahaman Khan Tobacco Enterprises Private Limited
Date of order
21 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/12/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Rahaman Khan Tobacco Enterprises Private Limited, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Decision: RESPONDENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURAND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI I.T.T.A.NOs.441,602,677 OF 2006; 34 of 2007;130 of 2008; 12 & 13 of 2009;246, 247 & 273 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) In view of our orders passed in ITTA.N...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI I.T.T.A.NOs.441,602,677 OF 2006; 34 of 2007; 130 of 2008; 12 & 13 of 2009;246, 247 & 273 of 2010 Dt: 21-03-2012. ITTA.NO.441 OF 2006 Between: THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXGUNTUR .. PETITIONER AND M/S.BOMMIDALA PURNAIAH HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED,4-20-24, RING ROAD,GUNTUR .. RESPONDENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURAND HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI I.T.T.A.NOs.441,602,677 OF 2006; 34 of 2007;130 of 2008; 12 & 13 of 2009;246, 247 & 273 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI Madan B.Lokur) In view of our orders passed in ITTA.NO.433 of 2011 and batch decidedon 13-03-2012, these appeals are disposed of. Dt: 21-03-2012. ( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ ) ( NOUSHAD ALI, J ) TNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan