Case LawHigh Court › Itta/12/2024 Of M/S. Bhaskara Enterprise...

Itta/12/2024 Of M/S. Bhaskara Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 20 Sep 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/12/2024 Of M/S. Bhaskara Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
20 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/12/2024 Of M/S. Bhaskara Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL [No:12 ][of ][2024] lncome tax Tribunal Appeal under [Section ][260-4 ][of ][the ][lncome ][tax ][Act, ][1961 ][,]against the order of the [lncome ][Tax ][Appellate Tribunal, ][Hyderabad ][in ] [No.]1512tHydt2019 for AssessmentYear [2013-14 ], [daled ][22-09-2023 ][preferred against]the order of the commissioner [of lncome Tax (Appeals)-7, ][Hyderabad ][dated ]['13-04-]2018 in Appeal No.0105/ClT(A)-7t2017-18, [preferred against ][the ][order ][of ][the]Assistant Commissioner of lncome [Tax, ][Circle ][-15 ][(1) ], [Hyderabad dated ][29-09-]2017 Between: M/s. Bhaskara Enterprises, D.No.2-17-18lC, [Plot No.9, ][Dha-rmapuri ][Colony, Near]Sii ai5a Temple, Uipal, [Hyderabad -500039. ][Rep , ][by ][its Managing Partner, ][Sri]P Srinivas Prasad, S/o. Sri P. [Bhaskar ][Rao] ...APPellant AND Deputy Commissioner of [lncome Tax, ][Circle ][-15(1), ][l.T ][Towers, ][Masabtank,]Hyderabad -500004. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: [A.V' ] Counsel for the Respondent: [Sri J.V. Prasad, Senior ][Standing ][Counsel ][for]lncome-Tax The Court delivered the [following: ] I i ilLC THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE IIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO ITTA No.1 2of 2o24 .IUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sp,J) Sri A.V.Raghu Ram, learned counsel, appears for theappellant. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that noadjudication is required in this appeal because under the scheme" Dlrect Tax Vlaad Se Vishutad,, the disputes are settled betweenthe parties. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Noco sts.co sts. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also standclosed. Sd/- A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-7, Hyderabad 3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -15 (1) , Hyderabad 4. One CC to SRI A.V. RAGHU RAM, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Sri J.V. Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome-Taxtopucl. 6. Two CD Copies Karn/gh HIGH COURT DATED:2010912024 JUDGMENTlTTA.No.12 of 2024 THIS APPEAL ISDISMISSEDAS WITHDRAWN 0clt-t1)azr\to lHE Sr4(,.(noo03[ntt]MEz.q.I tII
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan