Itta/122/2012 Of Global Energy Condulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/122/2012 Of Global Energy Condulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/122/2012 Of Global Energy Condulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In that view [of ][the ][matter, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn]with liberty to approach [this Court ][if ][there ][is ][no settlement under the ][said]Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
l.T.T.A. NO: 122OF 2012
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench [A, ][Hyderabad in ] No.1657/Hyd/2008 for Assessment Year 2004-2005 dated [30112110 ][preferred ][against]the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals-lll), ][Hyderabad, ][dated ][16/09/08]preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle No.2(3)PAN/ GIR No.
Between:
Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt.Ltd., 6-3-570/1 , Diamond Block, RockdaleCompound,Somajiguda, Hyderabad 50002...APPELLANTAND
Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2 [(3), lncome ][Tax ][Towers, A.C.Guards,]Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : Dr. P.B.VIJAYA KUMAR, [Advocate]For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA [SARMA, ][Advocate]
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE [M.S'ITAMACHANDIIA ]
ANI)
HONOURABLE [JUSTICE T'VIN-OD ] I.T[,T.A. ] [0F ][20t2]
JUDG MENT:[(Per ][Sri ][Justice ] [S.Rctntuchundru ][RuLt)]
Learned counsel [for ][the ][appellant has ][a ][filed ][a ][letter ][seel(ing]withdrawal of [this ][appeal on ][the ground that the appellant wishes ][to avail]the benefits [under ][the ][Direct ][Tax ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][Act' ][2020']introduced by [the Central ][Government']
2. In that view [of ][the ][matter, ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn]with liberty to approach [this Court ][if ][there ][is ][no settlement under the ][said]Act. No costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, shall also ][stand]dismissed.
Sd/-K.SREENIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARfi.SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
To1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench ,,A,, Hyderabad.3. ?. one 9n" CC to Sri [to Dr. ]B.Narjsimha [p.B.VUaya ][Xumar, ]Abrocr"i; ioprt;S.il;,;;;;ri""io!"rj"l4. Two CD CooiesKj.tdx
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410312021
ORDERITTA.No.122 ot 2012
DISD. AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA.
\'),'
E [STAre]1o(*)o10 [APH2$21] rl\,i,-/-tc',y\--i-:=::-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.