Itta/122/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Vi, Hyderabad v. M/S Suguna Motors Pvt Ltd., Warangal
High Court
24 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/122/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Vi, Hyderabad v. M/S Suguna Motors Pvt Ltd., Warangal
Date of order
24 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2000-01
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/122/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Vi, Hyderabad v. M/S Suguna Motors Pvt Ltd., Warangal, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
IVIONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
lTTA.No: 122 OF 2015
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 2604 of the lncome Tax Act, ['1961]against the order dated 12-02-2014 for Assessment Year 2000-01 inlTA. No.1212lHydl2009 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'A'Hyderabad.Between:Hyderabad.Between:
The Commissioner of lncome{ax-Vl, Hyderabad
...AppellantANDM/s Suguna Motors Pvt Ltd., 15-1-59/1, Opp. Govt Polytechnic, Autonagar'X'Road, Warangal.
...Respondent
Counsel forthe Appellant: Ms. B. Sapna Reddy, Junior Standing Counselrepresenting Mr. J.V. Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Taxrepresenting Mr. J.V. Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax
Counsel for the Respondent: None AppearedThe Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P'SAM ] ANDTIIE HONOURABLE NANDIKONDA
ITTA No. 1[22 ][0B ][2015]
JUDGMENT[ (per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][P.Sam ][Koshy)]
Heard Ms. [B.Sapna ][Reddy, ][learned ][Junior ][fitanding]
Counsel [representing ][Mr. ][J.V'Prasad, learned ][Senior ]['Standing]Counsel [for the ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the ][appellant' ][Perused]the record.
This appeal [under ][Section ][260,{ ][of ][the ][Incorne ][Tax ][Act']1961, has [been ][preferred ][by ][the ][Revenue ][as ][the ][appellant]against the order [dated 12'02'2014 ][passed ][by ][the ][In<;ome ][Tax]lnAppellate ['tribunal, ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]['A" ][Hydr:rabad']I.T.A.No.1212lHydl2OO9 [for ][the ][Assessmdnt ][Year ][2000-01']3. Central Board [of ][Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has ][issued ][Circular]No.9 of 2024 [date<\ ][17.09.2024, ][amending ][the ][previous Circular]No.5of2024datedl5.03.2024,byfurtherenhancingtht:monetarylimits for filing [appeals ][by the Income ]['Iax ][Department before ][the]lncome Tax [Appeltate ][Tribunals, ][High ][Courts and ][Supreme ][Court]
2
((
as a measure for reducing litigation In paragraph 2 of the said
Circular, we find that the monetary Iimit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetarylimit.limit.
5. Therefore, the appear filed by the Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.However, if the appear comes within the exception of circularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open to the Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shallstand closed
SD/- K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARG:SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPYII
To,1 Ihe [tlgomg ][Tax ][Appeilate.Tribunat, ]Bench [,A ]Hyderabad3 ?,13 33l%Y,:.'" Prasad s"n;oibt*alng';;J;;, ror rncome rax ropUCJKam/gh
(r
l-
\i t\
HIGH
DATED:2410312025
IiIII
.. l)t,,i' r-)1-JUDGMENTIv10 il]t 2025lIlTTA.No.122 [ot ][2015]*
DISMISSING THE APPEAL
R+-L'-rr{hI
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.