Itta/122/2023 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. Smt. Andem Sandhya Reddy
High Court
18 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/122/2023 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. Smt. Andem Sandhya Reddy
Date of order
18 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/122/2023 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central v. Smt. Andem Sandhya Reddy, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
tNcoME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO:122OF [2O23]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the [lncome ][tax ][Act,]1961, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal ["A" Bench, ][Hyderabad]( Assessment Year 20'19-2020) dated 28'02-2023 in l.T.A.No. 7lHydl2023 [preferred]against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals)-'12 ], [Basheerbagh,]Hyderabad -500 004 dated in Appeal No. [10451/2018-19 ][dated ][30-11-2022 ][,]preferred against the order of the Asst. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central CircleCentral Circle -2 (3) Hyderabad dated [2310312022 ][in ] [3437]Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome [Tax-Central, ][Hyderabad.]
...APPELLANT
AND
Smt. Andem Sandhya Reddy, C/o [M.V. Prasad, ][Sanath ][and Rajasekhara, ] 4:^A^-?-120186t3, Krishna Sindhu R6sidency, [Road ][No.03, Banjara ][Hills, ][Hyderabad ][500034]PAN No. .'.RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms, K. MAMATA
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P. SOMA
The Court delivered the following [Judgment ][:]
THE HON'BL E THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALC'KARADHE
AND
THE HON[,BLE ]SRI JUSTICE J.
RAO
INCOME TA}( TRIBUNAI APPEAL No.l22 of 2o23
JUDGME NT:(Per the Hon'ble the Chref Justbe Atok Aradhe)
Ms. K.Mamata Choudary, learned Senior StandingCounsel for Income Tax Department for the appeliant.
2. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellantseeks leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the tightof the Circular No.O9l2024, d,ated. tZ.Og.2O24, vi,ith theliberty to revive the same in case the subject matter of theappeal falls in any of the exceptions provided in theCircular No.5 / 2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn interms of the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneous applications pdnding, if any, shalt
stand closedHowever, there shall be no order as to costs.
sd/- K. sRtNtAJOINT REGISTRAR\ __---'-
//TRUE COPY//
SEcTSiloFFIcER
To1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad "A" Bench, Hyderabad1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad "A" Bench, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-12 , Basheerbagh,
Hyderabad.
3. The Asst. Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle Central Circle -2(3) Hyderabad.(3) Hyderabad.
4. One CC to SRl. K. MAMATA, Advocate [OPUCI[OPUCI
[OPUCI5. One CC to SRl. P. SOMA SHEKAR REDDY, Advocate
6. Two CD Copies
v"
v"krligh [rd]
HIGH COURT
DATED:1811212024
ORDERlTTA.No.'122 ol 2023
Dismissing the ITTA asWithdrawn without Costs
8[(p]deL
.)-iirrE [i^116-]()a)(_)$ B [lAlt]2[?5(-i)3i-S e^,i [Cv\][f-\)]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.