Itta/123/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissionr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
High Court
24 Mar 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/123/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissionr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad
Date of order
24 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2003-2004
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/123/2012 Of Global Energy Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissionr Of Income Tax, Hyderabad, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2. ln that view of the matter, this appeal [is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn]with liberti'to approach this Courl [if ][there ][is ][no settlement under the ][said]Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S,RAMACHANDRA ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T,VINOD KUMAR
|.T.T.A. NO: 123 OF 2012
I lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the lncome Tax Act, againstth'e order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A' ]Hyderabad in ITAINo.1656/Hyd/2008 for Assessment Year 2003-2004, daled 3O112110 preferred againsttfrL OrOer of the Commissioner of lncome Tax Appeals -lll, Hyderabad, preferredtagainst the Order of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle -2(3) PAN/GlRNo. G-1 38 dated 20 I 1 21 07
Between:
GLOBAL ENERGY CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD,, 6-3-s70/1 Diamond Block,Rockdale Compound, Somajiguda, Hyderabad 50002
...APPELLANT
AND
DEPUTY COMtVISSIONR OF INCOIVE TAX, Circle -2(3) lncome Tax Towers,A.C.Guards, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
:For the Appellant : Dr. P.B.VIJAYA KUMAR, Advocate
iFor the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA, Advocate
I
IThe Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
ANT)
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINoD KUMAII
1.1.1'.A. No.l23 OF 2012
.IT, I)C.\IE\T:[(Per ]Sri Ju.yticc ,\ l.S. Rturdchuntlr a Rx(tl
Learned counsel fbr the appellant has a llled a [letter ][seeking]u'ithdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the [appellant \\'ishes ][to ][avail]the benellts under the Direct Tax Vivad Se [Visl.rivas ][Act, ][2020,]introduced by the Central Government.
2. ln that view of the matter, this appeal [is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn]with liberti'to approach this Courl [if ][there ][is ][no settlement under the ][said]Act. No costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, shall also ][stand]disrrissed.
IIIi
srl/-K.SREENIVASA JOINT REGISTRAR\\,,SECTION
,TRUE
To1The lncome [Tax Appellate ][Tribunal' ][Hyderab^ad ][Bench ] [Hyderabad ][']2d". iU [Ubi.i- ][a ] [ii ][uvu ][k' ]Ul;:: X,"*: JB ?3 3l 3. One [to Sri ][B Narastml]",4. Two [CD CoPies]
K\
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:241A312021
Iil!..qit:cz.,J1 2 [ApR 2021]IID\rrs(lIORDERITTA.No.123 [ol ][2012]
I
DISD. AS [WITHDRAWN THE ITTA']
l'i>lsr9 tq
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.