Itta/125/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/125/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
2001-2002
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/125/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENThonourable SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
honourable SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
income tax tribunal appeal Nonf 9nn«
Appeal under Section 260(A) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalHyderabad Bench, Hyderabaddated20/07/2007 passedinI.T.A Nos. 571to574/Hyd./2006 fortheAssessment Years 1999-2000, 2000-2001. 2001-2002, 2002-2003 preferredagainst the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax^(Appeals), Tirupathidated 13/03/2006 passed in Appeal No.92/ACIT-C-1{1)/TPT/CIT(A)/TPT/05-06 for the Assessment Year 2001-2002 preferred against the order of theAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax. Central Circle, Tirupathi passedinPAN/GIR No. K-601, dated 15/03/2005 for the Assessment Year 2001-2002.
Between:Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust, Tirupati.
...Appellant
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Tirupati.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:Sri Y. Ratnakar (NP)Counsel for the Respondent:The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 125 of 2008
ORDER:-
No representationfor the appellant. The matterislisted in the weekly list.
2.The matter pertains to the year 2008.
3.In view of the above, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal
is dismissed for “want of prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneouspetitions,if any
pending, shall also stand closed.
To
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRARLSECIIQN-OFFICER
1. TheRegistrar,Income Tax AppellateTribunal,HyderabadBench,Hyderabad.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, (Appeals), Tirupathi, Tirupathi,[[Chittoor][ District.]][[ District.]]3. TheAssistantCommissiorierofIncomeTax,. CentralCircle,-2,Tirupathi, Chittoor District.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, (Appeals), Tirupathi, Tirupathi,[[Chittoor][ District.]][[ District.]]
4. One CC to Sri Y. Ratnakar, Advocate, High Court of AP, Amaravati
(OPUC)
5. Three CD Copies.
MSR
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/11/2023
ORDERITTA.No.125 of 2008
oo>'VHo;fa:31 JUL 2Tl'\CJft;mCurrent Section
DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A. FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.