Case LawHigh Court › Itta/129/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/129/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee

High Court 21 Apr 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/129/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee
Date of order
21 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Itta/129/2011 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Agricultural Market Committee, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY , THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANITTA .NO:129 of 2011 ( Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A the income tax Act- 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Branch, Visakhapatnam in ITA No. 327/ Vizag/2008 D/6/2/2009 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Rajahmundry dated 26/3/2008 in ITA. Nos. 170 to 172/W2AMP/CIT (A) Rjy/07-08, preferred against the order of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2-Amalapuram, GIR no./panNo.AAN FA 7031A) Between: Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry., AND ..... Petitioner Agricultural Market Committee, Kothapet. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S.R. ASHOK Counsel for the Respondent:---- The court made the following Order:- .....Respondent //TRUE COPY// Sd/- C.V. RAMAKRISHNAASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To;- 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhpatnam Branch, Visakhapatnam.Visakhapatnam. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax ( appeals), Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.East Godavari District. 3.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2-, Amalapuram, EastGodavari District.Godavari District. 4.Two C.Cs. to Sri S.R. Ashok, Advocate ( Income Tax Standing Counsel (OPUC).Standing Counsel (OPUC). 5.Two c.d. copies. Ags HIGH COURTVVSR J & RR JDt: 21/04/2011 ORDER:- ITTA .NO:129 of 2011 Allowing the AppealWithout costs.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan