Itta/130/2001 Of Prudential Construction Co. Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assts)
High Court
31 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/130/2001 Of Prudential Construction Co. Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assts)
Date of order
31 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/130/2001 Of Prudential Construction Co. Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assts), the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In this view of the matter, we find no reason to keep this appeal pending anyfurther and it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
ITTA No. 130 OF 2001
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This appeal was filed by Mr. S. Ravi, who is now designated as SeniorAdvocate. On last occasion, Mr. Pushyam Kiran, learned advocate holding for Mr. S.Ravi informed the Court that the appellant – company had gone into liquidation andthe Official Liquidator had taken charge of it.
Today, Mr. Balajee, learned counsel holding for Mr. M. Anil Kumar, learnedcounsel for the Official Liquidator submits that the liquidation proceedings are almostcomplete and what remains with the Liquidator as on today is only Rs.17,000/-.
Official Liquidator is not brought on record either by the appellant – Companyor the Official Liquidator has also not made any application for allowing him torepresent the appellant.
In this view of the matter, we find no reason to keep this appeal pending anyfurther and it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
______________________
31-03-2015
ks
_______________________________
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.