Itta/130/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, It Towers v. M/S. Crescent Real Estates
High Court
18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/130/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, It Towers v. M/S. Crescent Real Estates
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/130/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, It Towers v. M/S. Crescent Real Estates, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal frled [by ][the ][Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid Circular [No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17.09'2024']However, if the appeal [comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Department to]seek revival...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
{.,'!
tN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABADTUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P"SAM ANI)THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [NO: ][130 OF ][2012]
Appeal filed under Section [260(A) of ][the ][lncome.Tax ][Act., ][1961, against ][the]order dated 13.05.2011 [passed ][in ][lTA.No. 494/Hydl2010 ][for the ][assessment ][year]2006-2007 on the file of the [lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal ][Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B']Hyderabad [preferred ]against [the order ][dated ][26.02.2010 ][passed ][in ][lTA.No.]o126tClT[A]-lll/08.09 [on ][the ][file ][of the ][commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax ][(Appeals)-lll,]Hyderabad preferred against [the ][Assessment ][order ][dated ][26.12.2008 ][passed ][in]PAN/GIR No. AAEFC-1296-N [on ][the ][file ][of ][the Joint commissioner ][of ][lncome ][Tax,]Range-8, HYderabad.
Between:
Commissioner of lncome [Tax-lll, ][lT ][Towers, A.C. Guards, ][Hyderabad]
...Appellant
AND
lvl/s. crescent Real Estates, [9-4-771N2361A, ][41-Hasmath colony ][Lane ][beside]Bandhan Function Hall, [Tolichowki ][Hyderabad]
...ResPondent
Counsel for the [Appellant ][: ][Ms. ][B. ][Sapna Reddy ][Standing. ][Counsel]representing Mr. [J.V. ][Prasad ][Senior]Standing Counsel [for the ][lncome ][Tax]Department
Counsel for the Respondent [: ][Sri ][Dantu ][Srinivas]
The Court delivered the [following:]
.d HONOURABLE [JUSTICE P'SAM KOSHY]ANDrHE HoNoIIRABLE [sRi ][Jusrrcn ] [RAo]NANDIKONDA
ITTANo.[ 130 ][0][F][ 2012]
JUDGMENT': [/Pct ][Hon 'ble ][Sri ][Justice P.Sam ][KoshY)]
Heard [Ms' ][B'Sapna ][Reddy' ][leamed ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel [representing ][Mr' ][J'V'Prasad' ][leamed ][Senior ][Standing]Counsel [for ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the appellant' ][Perused]the record'
This appeal [under Section ][260,{ ][of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act']1961, has [been ]Preferred [bY ][the][ Revenue ][as ][the ][aPPellant]against [the ][order dated ][13'05'2011 ][passed ][by ][the ][Income Tax]Appellate [T'ribunal, Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B" ][Hyderabad' ][in]I.T.A.No.494/HYD/2010 [for ][the Assessment ][Year ][2006-07 ][']
)
3.CentralBoardofDirectTaxes(CBDT)hasissuedCircularNo.9 of [2024 ][dated ][l7'Og'2024' ][amending ][the ][previous Circular]No.5 [of ][202'1 ][dated ][15'03'2024' by further ][enhancing ][the ][monetary]timits for [filing ][appeals ][by ][the Income Tax Department ][before the]Income [Tax ][Appellate Tribunals, ][High ][Courts ][and ][Supreme ][Court]\ \
tI
as a measure for reducing [litigation. ][ln ][paragraph ][2 ][of ][the ][said]Circular, we find [that the ][monetary ][limit ][fixed ][for fiting ][an ][appeal]before the High Court [is Rs.2.00 ][crore.]
4. In the instant appeal, tax [effect is ][well ][below ][the ][monetary]Iimit.
5. Therefore, the appeal frled [by ][the ][Department ][is ][dismissed in]terms of the aforesaid Circular [No.9 ][of ][2024 ][dated 17.09'2024']However, if the appeal [comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular]No.5 of 2024, it would [be open ][to ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Department to]seek revival ofthe appeal. [There shall ][be ][no ][order ][as ][to ][costs.]
6. Consequently, miscellaneous [petitions pending, ][if ][any, ][shall]stand closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA INT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
o
1. The lncome [Tax ][Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B' ][Hyderabad]
2. TheCommissioner [of ][lncome Tax ][(Appeals)-lll, ][Hyderabad']
3. The Joint [Commissioner ][of ][lncome Tax, Range-8' Hyderabad']
4. One CC to Ms. [B. ][Sapna ][Reddy ][Standing Counsel ][
5. One CC to [Sri ][Dantu Srinivas, ][Advocate ] ]
6. Two CD [CoPies]
DL/gh%
d?: [!]
d?: Ls.
a
HIGH COURT
DATED:18/0212025
ORDER
t- ::. [lTTA.No.130 ][of ][2012]
DISMISSING TFlE ITTA.
€'t-<,-b.
,ff..tHf [STe]6(o(.)2 4 fiAB 2025I)tF\oar^rr('
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.