Itta/132/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited
High Court
02 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/132/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited
Date of order
02 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/132/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, Hyderabad v. M/S Vbc Ferro Alloys Limited, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 3In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of interms of the liberty as prayed for.terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SECOND TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL [NO: ][132 OF ][2008]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section [260 ] [of ][the ][lncome ][Tax ][Act,]1961 against the Order made in l.T.A.No.362/Hyd12003, [dated ][23-O2-20O7 ][on the ][{ib]of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad Bench ]['A', ][Hyderabad, ][for ][the]Assessment Year 1999-2000, [preferred against ][the ][Order made ][in ][l.T.A.No.9'llAC-]3(4yClT(A)-lv/2002-03 dated [24-12-2002 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the commissioner of ][lncome]Tax, (Appeals)-lV, Hyderabad [preferred ][against ][the ][Order ][made ][in ] No.AAACW258A / V4, dated 05-03-2002 [on the file ][of ][Assistant ][Commissioner of]lncome Tax, Circle-3(4), Hyderabad.
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome [Tax-lll' ][Hyderabad]
...Appellant
AND
M/s VBC Ferro Alloys Limited, [6-2-9131914,3rd Floor, Progressive Towers,]Khairthabad, Hyderabad [- ]500 [004]
...Respondent
Mr J V Prasad Senbr Standing [Coungel]
Counsel for the Appellantfor lne,ome Tax Department
Counsel for the Respondent : '- [-]
The Court delivered the following [Judgment ][:]
\
THE HON'BLE THE [C]HIEF [AI,OK ] ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.132 of [2OO8]
JUDGMENT; lPer the rlotl'bte the c['hief ]Justlce [AIok ][Aradhe)]
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel [for]Income Tax Department for the appellant
2. l,earned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellantsubmits that the subject matter of the appeal appears [to ][be]below the monetary limit prescribed in the CircularNo.O9/2024, dated 17.O9.2O24. He, therefore, seeks leaveof this CoLrrt to withdraw the appeal in the light of theCircular No.O9 /2024, dated 17.09.2024, [with, ]the liberty torevive the same in case the subject matter of the appealfalls in aly of the exceptions provided in the CircularNo.S/2024 dated 15.03.2024. Learned Senior StandingCounsel for the appellant further submits that, in addition,the appellant be also granted the liberty to revive theappeal in czrse the subject matter of the appeal is above the
*01
monetary limit prescribed
in the Circular No.O9/2O24,
dated L7.O9.2O24.
3In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of interms of the liberty as prayed for.terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaleousapplications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
6+
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJOINTAEGISTRAR\-)-sEgl'lorv oFFtcER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, (Appeals)_lV, HyderabadThe Commissioner of lncome Tax, (Appeals)_lV, Hyderabad
3. The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle_3(4), Hyderabad I
4. One CC to Mr J V prasad, Senior Standing Counsel for lncome TaxSenior Standing Counsel for lncome Tax
Department [OpUC]
5. Two CD Copies
VA/ghw
I
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210112025
JUDGMENT
!TTA.No.132 of 2008
DISPOSING OF THE ITTA
.d4+&*
HE \[1]A()2 ['r ] it 2025za*I;rralcttt'!-:;:.;-r,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.