Case LawHigh Court › Itta/134/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Famil...

Itta/134/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax

High Court 06 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/134/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax
Date of order
06 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/134/2008 Of Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Incometax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI ANDHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 134 of 2008 Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabaddated 20/07/2007 passedinI.T.A Nos.571to 574/Hyd./2006fortheAssessment Years 1999-2000, 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 preferredagainst the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathidated 13/03/2006 passed in Appeal No.96/ACIT-C-1(1)/TPT/CIT(A)/T 06 for the Assessment Year 1999-2000 preferred against the order oftheAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Tirupathi passedinPAN/GIR No. K-600, dated 14/03/2005 for the Assessment Year 1999-2000 Between: Keli Bai Chowdary Family Trust,Tirupati. AND ...Appellant The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle, Tirupati. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Y. Ratnakar (NP) Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following Order: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 134 of 2008 ORDER;- No representationfor theappellant. The matteris listed in the weekly list. 2.The matter pertains to the year 2008. 3.In view of the above, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto,miscellaneous petitions,if any pending, shall also stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRAR To SECTION OFFICER 1. The Chairman,Income Tax AppellateTribunal,HyderabadBench,Hyderabad.Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Tirupathi, Chittoor[ District.] 3. TheAssistantCommissionerofIncomeTax,CentralCircle,-2,Tirupathi, Chittoor District.Tirupathi, Chittoor District. 4. One CC to Sri Y. Ratnakar, Advocate, (OPUC) 5. Three CD Copies. MSR sree HIGH COURTDATED:10/11/2023 ORDERITTA.No.134 of 2008 DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A. FOR WANT OFPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan