Itta/137/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. V.dhana Reddy And Co
High Court
14 Nov 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/137/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. V.dhana Reddy And Co
Date of order
14 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/137/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. M/S. V.dhana Reddy And Co, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are accordingly dismissed. ______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (K.Vijaya Lakshmi, J) CVNR,J & KVL, J I.T.T.A.Nos.137 and 139 of 2017 Date: 14.11.2017
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE K.VIJAYA LAKSHMI
I.T.T.A.Nos.137 and 139 of 2017
Date: 14.11.2017
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, … Visakhapatnam Appellant And M/s. V.Dhana Reddy and Co. D.No.23-23-2, Beach Road, … Visakhaptnam – 530 001. Respondent : Counsel for the Appellant Mr.K. Raji Reddy, Senior Standing Counsel for I.T. Department Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. T.V.L.Narasimha Rao
The Court made the following:
CVNR,J & KVL, J I.T.T.A.Nos.137 and 139 of 2017 Date: 14.11.2017
Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
These two appeals by the Revenue, arise out of common order dated 25.02.2016 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench, Visakhapatnam (in short ‘the Tribunal’) in I.T.A.Nos.653 and 654/Vizag/2013, pertaining to the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08.
2. At the hearing, it is agreed between the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent-assesssee that the order set aside by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and confirmed by the Tribunal by the orders impugned in these appeals, was passed consequent upon the remand made by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and that the said remand order was set aside by the Tribunal, which order in turn was affirmed by this Court by its judgment dated 08.11.2017 in I.T.T.A.Nos.553 and 558 of 2017.
3. Inasmuch as, the very order of remand in pursuance of which the Assessing Officer has passed a fresh assessment order was set aside, the consequential order of the Assessing Officer would cease to have any legs to stand.
4. In this view of the matter, the orders of the Tribunal impugned in these appeals, cannot be interfered with.
5. The appeals are accordingly dismissed.
______________________
(C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
_____________________
(K.Vijaya Lakshmi, J)
CVNR,J & KVL, J I.T.T.A.Nos.137 and 139 of 2017 Date: 14.11.2017
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.