Itta/138/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Nitin Kumar Shah
High Court
04 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/138/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Nitin Kumar Shah
Date of order
04 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/138/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I v. Nitin Kumar Shah, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 138 of 2014
Date: 04.03.2014
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Hyderabad.
… Appellant
And
Sri Nitin Kumar Shah,Hyderabad.
… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No. 138 of 2014
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Mr. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant,and gone through a portion of the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal relating to ITA.No.872/Hyd/2013 against which thepresent appeal has been filed.
We find that the learned Tribunal on fact found that pre-conditionfor imposing of penalty or for that matter initiating penalty proceedingsare not satisfied. It appears that while furnishing revised returns somebenefit under the Income Tax Act, 1961 was sought for and the samewas disallowed. Therefore, it is a fit case of concealment of income andfurnishing of inaccurate particulars.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
___________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.