Itta/140/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/140/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/140/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 140 OF 2012
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act., 1961against the order made in l.T.A.No.990/H/06, [Dated 27.06.2008 ][on the file of ][the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ][Hyderabad, ][for ][the]Assessment Year 2002-03 [preferred ]against the order made in [l.T.A.No.319 ][to]322tAClT-16(1)/ClT(A)-Vl2005-06 Dated [21,08.2006 ][on ][the file of ][ttre ][Commissioner]of lncome Tax, (Appeals)-V, Hyderabad [preferred against ][the ][Order made ][in]PAN/GIR No , Dated 22.02.2006 on the [file ][of ][Assistant]Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.)against the order made in l.T.A.No.990/H/06, [Dated 27.06.2008 ][on the file of ][the]lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['B', ][Hyderabad, ][for ][the]Assessment Year 2002-03 [preferred ]against the order made in [l.T.A.No.319 ][to]322tAClT-16(1)/ClT(A)-Vl2005-06 Dated [21,08.2006 ][on ][the file of ][ttre ][Commissioner]of lncome Tax, (Appeals)-V, Hyderabad [preferred against ][the ][Order made ][in]PAN/GIR No , Dated 22.02.2006 on the [file ][of ][Assistant]Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle-16(1), Hyderabad.)
Between:The Commissioner of lncome Tax-lV, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
Nagarjuna Aqua Exports Ltd., 6, Nagarjuna [Hills, Punjagutta, ][,rO"r::6ES"%NDENT]
Counsel for the Appbllant : SRl. J.V.PRASAD [(SC ] [INCOME TAX)]Counsel for the Respondent : --
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HoN'BLE THE CHIEF.IUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRTBUNAL APPEAL No. 14O of 2Ol2
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon,bl,e the Chief Justice AIok Aradhe)
Mr. J.v.prasad, learned senior standing counser for Income TaxDepartment for the appellant.
2.
Learnerj Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal in the light of the CircularNo'o9/2024, datect No'o9/2024, datect 17.09.2024, with the liberry to rerrive the same incase the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Circular No.S/2024 dated I5.O3.2O24.
3.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in terms
of the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
IKAUNA VARMA
JOINT REGISTRAR( \,-
//TRUE COPYII
,..,J
SECTloN OFFICER
To,
l. The hcome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,8,, 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, (Ajpeals)_V, iiOeraOaOHyderabad2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax, (Ajpeals)_V, iiOeraOaOHyderabad
3. The Assistant commissioner or tncomJi"- 'cr"r'.liotr 4. One CC One CC CC l, Hyderabad.4. One CC One CC CC l, Hyderabad.
4. One CC One CC CC to Sri J.V.prasad, S.C for tncome i* 5. Two Two CD <-OpUCl5. Two Two CD <-OpUCl
5. Two Two CD Copies
Ksighw
/
l
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:20 t1Z\ZOZ4
JUDGMENTl.T.T.A.No.140 ot 2O1Z
Dismissing the Appeal asWithdrawn. Without costs.
nt@
*G'
,1;1r [uf]t[Or]^4so,,(,B 0 ;ru :nzs![\]!!P4 [r'r;ur ^]tp
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.