Itta/14/2019 Of Pr Comissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. M/S.hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo(P) Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD N4ONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 14 OF 2019 Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 againstorder dated 08-06-2018 in l.T.A. No. 1574 I HYDI 2017 on the file of the Court of thelncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad ["8" ]Bench, Hyderabad , Assessment Year2013-14 preferred against the order dated 30-06-2017 in lT.A.No. 018212016-17 onthe file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals )-2, Hyderabad [preferred]against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 2 (2) ,Hyderabad dated 08-02-2014 in PAN /GlR No. Between:Pr Comissioner Of lncome Tax-2, Hyderabad ...APPELLANT ANDM/S.Hyderabad Menzies Air Cargo(P) Ltd, Air Cargo Terminal, Rajiv Gandhilnternational Airport, Shamshabad, R.R.Dist., ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: MS K. MAMATA CHOUOARYSenior Counsel for l.T.Dept. Counsel for the Respondenl: Mr. CHALLA GUNARANJANThe Court made the following: JUDGMENT THE HON'BLE THE CTIIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYAN ANDTHE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ST]REPAI,LI NANDA ITTA No.14 of 2OL9 JUDGMENT: [per ]the Hotl'bte the C hief Ju stie Ujjal Bhug an) Heard Ms. K.Mamta Choudary, iearned SeniorStanding Counsel for Income Tax Department appcaringfor the appellant and Mr. Challa Gunaranjan, learnedcounsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dateci08.06.20i8 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hl dcrabad Benchts', Hyderabad1nI.T.A.No. l57alHydl20 l7 for the assessment year 20i3-14. 3. The appeal rvas admitted for hearing on 24.O1 .2019 4. Today learned counsel for the appeilant submits thaton an application filed by the respondent under the DirectTax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2O2O, the matter has beensettled betr.r,een the parties following which full and final settlement dues have been paid by the respondent"Therefcre, appellant would like to withdrau, the appeal. 5. In view of the above, this appeal is disrnissed onwithdra'iuai. 6. Miscellaneous appiications pending, if any, shallstand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs Sd/-B.S.CHIRANJEEVIJOINr BEqlsrRAR,=.r,JffB.r,.r* //rRUE coPY// 1. The lncome [Tax Appellate Tribunal,, Hyderabad ][B.qngh ]["B-' ]' [Hyderabad']i. f i,e Commissioner'of [lncome ][Tax ][( ][Appeals )-2 ][, ][Hyrfrabad.]; iii; A";i;6acommissioner [of ][lntbm6 Tax ][circle ][2 ][(2L ][Hvderabad']i d;ee'6il. [(rtlnMnin ][cHouDARt sc ][for lncorng^rax ][[oPUC]]d. il; aa io [Mi. ][cHnuu ][cuNARANJAN ][Advocate ][[oPUC]]6. Two [CoPies]7. One Spare [CoPY]\P I HIGH COURTDATED:1 110712022 JUDGMENTlTTA.No.14 of 2019[2 [stP ][2][Ii?] I)ISNIISSIN(;'f II I] APP!]AI, AS WII'HDRA\\TN. \L,-a1,