Case LawHigh Court › Itta/145/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/145/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, It Towers v. Smt.c.nagarani

High Court 06 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/145/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, It Towers v. Smt.c.nagarani
Date of order
06 Aug 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/145/2012 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, It Towers v. Smt.c.nagarani, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, we dismiss the appeal on that ground alone.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.145 of 2012 Date: 06.08.2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-V,Hyderabad. .....Appellant AND C.Nagarani, Secunderabad ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.145 of 2012 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) No certified copy of the impugned order has been annexed tothis appeal. Hence, we dismiss the appeal on that ground alone. However, liberty is given to the appellant to file fresh appeal with thecertified copy, within a period of four weeks from date, failing which theissue will be a closed chapter. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall standclosed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________ 06.08.2013 Gsn K.C.BHANU, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan