Itta/147/2004 Of Chandana Leaphin Finance Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Apr 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/147/2004 Of Chandana Leaphin Finance Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Apr 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Itta/147/2004 Of Chandana Leaphin Finance Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: The only question raised in the appeal is whether on the factsand in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law indisallowing deduction of lease equalisation charges from the grosslease receipts.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALEAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
ITTA No. 147 OF 2004
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 isdirected against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ in ITA No.344/H/02, dated 25-06-2004 for theassessment year 1997-98.
The only question raised in the appeal is whether on the factsand in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law indisallowing deduction of lease equalisation charges from the grosslease receipts.
At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant invited ourattention to the judgment of this Court dated 05-02-2015 in ITTA Nos.252 and 291 of 2003; 76 and 77 of 2006 and 132 and 136 of 2004 andsubmitted that similar question was raised in these appeals. Shesubmits that the instant appeal also deserves to be allowed answeringthe question in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue does not disputethe submission made by learned counsel for the appellant.
In the circumstances, we dispose of this appeal answering thesubstantial question of law in favour of the assessee and against theRevenue, in terms of the judgment dated 05-02-2015 passed in ITTANos.252 and 291 of 2003 and the connected appeals.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of. Noorder as to costs.
______________________
DILIP B. BHOSALE, J
15-04-2015ks
_______________________________A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.