Case LawHigh Court › Itta/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Vi v. Rajender Pershad Tej Prakash

High Court 12 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Vi v. Rajender Pershad Tej Prakash
Date of order
12 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/151/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax- Vi v. Rajender Pershad Tej Prakash, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: We dismiss the appeal as being withdrawn with liberty to pursuethe other remedies, as are available to him under the law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 151 of 2014 DATED:12.3.2014 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax,Hyderabad. … Appellant And Rajender Pershad Tej Prakash,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A. No. 151 of 2014 Judgment:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Mr. S.R. Ashok, learned Senior Counsel appearing for theappellant submits that he wants to withdraw the appeal with liberty topursue other remedies. We dismiss the appeal as being withdrawn with liberty to pursuethe other remedies, as are available to him under the law. No costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 12[th] March, 2014 PNB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan