Itta/153/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Natco Pharma Limited
High Court
20 Dec 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/153/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Natco Pharma Limited
Date of order
20 Dec 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/153/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv v. M/S. Natco Pharma Limited, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 153OF 2012
(lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 A of the lncome Tax Act.,1961 against the order made in l.TANo.1219lHyd/2006, Dated 18.03.2008 on thefile of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'B', Hyderabad, for the AssessmentYear 2000-01 preferred against the order made in l.T.A,No.090/AC-16(lyClT(A)-V 12006-07 Dated 25.09.2006 on the file of the Commissioner of lncome Tax,(Appeals)-V, Hyderabad preferred against the brder made in PAN/GlRNo. /N-376, Dated 27.O3.2006 on the file of Assistant Commissioner oflncome Tax Circle-'l 6( 1 ), Hyderabad.)
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax-|V,, Hyderabad
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s. Natco Pharma Limited,, Natco House, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. J.V.PRASAD(sc FoR rNcoME TAX)(sc FoR rNcoME TAX)
--Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following: Judgment
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AIID
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO
INCOME TA)( TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 153 of 2012
JUDGMENT: (Per tlrc Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment for the appellant.
2.
Learnecl Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant seeks
leave of this court to withdraw the appeal in the light of the circularNo.O9/2024, dated 17.O9.2024, with the liberty to revive tl-re same incase the subject matter of the appeal falls in any of the exceptionsprovided in the Circula:- No.S/2024 dated 15.03.2024.
3.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in termsof the liberty as prayed for.
Miscellaleous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA
JorNr.qEG_lsrRAR /
//TRUE COPY//
SEC{ION OFFICER
To,
1. The Registrar, [lncome ][Tax ][Appellate Tribunal' Eench ]['8" ][Hyderabad']
z. The Coirmissioner [of lncome Tax, (Appeals)-V' Hyderabad]
;.fnenssistantCommissioneroflncomeTaxCircle-16(1)'Hyderabad
4. One CC to [Sri J.V.Prasad, ][S.C ][for lncome Tax ][(OPUC)]
5. Two CD CoPies
Ks/ghw
HIGH COURT
DATED:2011212024
JUDGMENTITTA.No.153 of 2012
DISMISSING THE APPEAL ASWTHDRAWN. WITHOUT COSTS.
orefqD'Kft
t'!i.1r{E Sf4'('I(O B JA|ll 2OZ5L,)a1*f I\1'rt cuf
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.