Case LawHigh Court › Itta/154/2003 Of N. Ranga Prasad v. Comm...

Itta/154/2003 Of N. Ranga Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd And Anr

High Court 29 Oct 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/154/2003 Of N. Ranga Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd And Anr
Date of order
29 Oct 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/154/2003 Of N. Ranga Prasad v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Hyd And Anr, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Today also, there is no representation.Therefore, the appeals are dismissed for default.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAMI.T.T.A.Nos.154 and 243 of 2003 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) The appeals were listed on several occasions earlier. There was norepresentation for the appellant. Yesterday also, there was notrepresentation. Hence, the appeals were directed to be listed today‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation.Therefore, the appeals are dismissed for default. The miscellaneous petitions filed in these appeals shall alsostand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date: 29.10.2014JSU ________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM JSU I.T.T.A.Nos.154 and 243 of 2003 Date: 29.10.2014
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan