Case Law › High Court › Itta/155/2005 Of M/S.viswarupa Buildersa...

Itta/155/2005 Of M/S.viswarupa Buildersanddevelopers (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 13 Aug 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

13 Aug 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/155/2005 Of M/S.viswarupa Buildersanddevelopers (P) Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, we dismiss the appeal on that ground alone.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.155 of 2005 Date: 13.08.2013 Between: M/s Viswarupa Builders & Developers (P) Ltd.,Hyderabad. .....Appellant AND Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1)Hyderabad. ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU I.T.T.A.No.155 of 2005 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) No certified copy of the impugned order has been annexed tothis appeal. Hence, we dismiss the appeal on that ground alone. However, liberty is given to the appellant to file fresh appeal with thecertified copy, within a period of four weeks from date, failing which theissue will be a closed chapter. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall standclosed. No order as to costs. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _______________ 13.08.2013 Gsn K.C.BHANU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.