Itta/155/2018 Of Serene Country Owners Welfare Association v. Income Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M,S.RAMACHANDRA RAOAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2018 (lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260 of the lncome Tax Act, against theorder of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad in ITANo. 12621Hyd12016, for assessment Year 2012-13 daled 12-07-2017 preferred againstthe Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax ( Appeals ) - 9 , Hyderabad in ITA No.446 & 4451ffO, Ward - B (1) I 2015-16 dated 29-02-20'16 preferred against the Orderof the lncome Tax Officer, Ward [- ]I [(1 ]) , Hyderabad PAN/GIR No.AADAS91 30P dated19-02-2015.)Between: Serene Country Owners Welfare Association, Sy.No.91, Serene Residential Township,Telecom Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad - 32 ...APPELLANT AND lncome Tax Officer, ward-8 (1), D Block, lncome Tax Towers, AC. Guards, Hyderabad ,.,RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that for the reasons stated [in ][the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased to condone the]delay of 99 days in filing the appeal.IANO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that for the [reasons stated ][in ][the]atfidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court [may ][be ][pleased ][to ][pass ][and]order dispensing with the filing of [the ][certified ][copy ][of ][the ][order ][dated'12.07.2017]passed by the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad in ITA No.1262lHydl2016for the assessment year 2012-13. 14 NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [for the ][reasons stated ][in ][the]affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court [may be pleased ][to ][permit ][the]petitioner to withdraw lA No. 1 ol 2018 in ITTA No. 155 of 2018 with liberty to file [a]fresh interim application for condonation of delay [taking ][the ][aforesaid ][stand ][as]mentioned in its grounds of appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI CH. PUSHYAM Counsel for the Respondent: SMT K. [Sr' ][S.C. ][for ][l.T. Dept.] The Court made the following: ORDER 7'IIE HONOURABI,II SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR I.T.I'.A.No.155 of 201 8 JUDGMENT : (Per I ion'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Learned counsel tbr appellant states that the appellant seeks towithdraw this Appea! since the matrer is seuled under Vivad SeVishwas Scheme, 2020.Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Recording the same, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. NocostS. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/. K, GANGADHARA RAOJOINT REGISTRARCPSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To1The lncome-Ta1.4pp_qtlqte Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench B, Hyderabad.2One CC to SRI CH. PUSHYAM K|RAN, Advocate [OpUC]One CC to SMT. K. MAMATA CHOWDARY, Sr. S.C for t.i. Dept. tOpUCl4Two CD Copies MP \ HIGH COURT DATED:2010112021 ORDER l.T.T.A.No.155 of 2018 DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS t!^-'Ytgt ?r14