Itta/156/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. N Surya Prakash Rao
High Court
06 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/156/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. N Surya Prakash Rao
Date of order
06 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/156/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii v. N Surya Prakash Rao, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.156 OF 2014
DATED:6.3.2014
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax –IIIIT Towers, A.C. GuardsHyderabad … Appellant
And
Shri N. Surya Prakash Rao … Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. NO.156 OF 2014
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
We have heard Sri B. Narasimha Sarma, learned counsel for theappellant and gone through the impugned judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal.
After perusing the records placed before it the learned Tribunalfound that the reasons for reopening of the assessment under Section148 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were notcommunicated to the assessee before passing the assessment order. In view of the fact finding, we think that the decision of the Tribunal isabsolutely correct and we don not want to interfere with the same.
The appeal is therefore dismissed. There will be no order as tocosts.
________________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
_______________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
6.3.2014bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.