Itta/157/2005 Of M/S. Aldec Corporation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
22 Aug 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/157/2005 Of M/S. Aldec Corporation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/157/2005 Of M/S. Aldec Corporation v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND TWENWTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
l.T.T.ANo: 157 of 2005
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act,1961against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A',Hyderabad in ITA No.946/Hyd/1995, for assessment Year 1989-90 dated 30-12-2004, preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Taxagainst the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A',Hyderabad in ITA No.946/Hyd/1995, for assessment Year 1989-90 dated 30-12-2004, preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax(Appeals), Hyderabad Appeal No.861/AC 3-zlclT AC/94 95, dated 27-03-1995,preferred against the Order of the Assistant lncome Tax. Hyderabad PAN/GIR No.A-327 , dated: 28-3-94.
Between:
M/s. AldecCorporation, 7-2-1668, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad - 500 018Representedby its Partner Mr. Harish Asar, S/o. V.P. Asar, aged 43 years.
...APPELLANT/Appel lant
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 3(2), Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/Respondent
l.A NO: 1 OF 2006(ITTAMP. NO: 41 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased that therecovery of interest amount Rs. 1,80,910/- levied under Section 220(2) of thelncome Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90 be stayed pending thedisposal of the appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI S. RAVI
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K. RAJI REDDY(SENIOR SC INCOME TAX
DEPT)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDHON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
r.T.T.A.NO.157 0F 200s
ORDER: (per Hon'bte Sri Justice P.Sc,m Rosllg)
Learned counsel Sri S.Ravi for the petitioner prays to \rithdraw
the Appeal
As prayr:d for, Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There
shall be no orcler as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, il any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVIJOINT REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A,, Hyderabad
2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Circle-3(2), 4rh Floor, Ayakar Bhavan,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
4. One CC to SRI S. RAV|, Advocate [OpUC]
5. One CC to SRt. K RAJ| REDDY(SEN|OR SC TNCOME TAX DEpr) tOpUCl
6. Two CD Copies
kam
HIGH COURTDATED:2210812023
ORDERlTTA.No.157 of 2005
THE APPEAL ISDISM!SSEDAS WITHDRAWN
Ji'iir"[:l ][f,\'l.C][ o]A):li.r?ffio14 [sE]_t^++n DESprrlc,
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.