Itta v. V Dwarakanath Reddy, Chittoor
High Court
27 Sep 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta v. V Dwarakanath Reddy, Chittoor
Date of order
27 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta v. V Dwarakanath Reddy, Chittoor, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
I.T.T.A.No.161 of 2016
JUDGMENT:{Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax, would submit that, in terms of CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018, all appeals, where the tax effect is below Rs.50,00,000/-, are required to be withdrawn and, as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.50,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel would seek liberty to file an application for restoration of the appeal, in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the aforesaid Circular issued by the Central Board.
Granting liberty as sought for, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to state that, in case the appeal falls within any of the exceptions referred to in the Circular, this order shall not disable the appellant from furnishing details as to how the appeal falls within the said exceptions and, thereafter, to prefer a fresh appeal in accordance with law.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
27[th ]September, 2018 JSUJSU
____________________________
(KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, J)
JSU
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI
I.T.T.A.No.161 of 2016
Date: 27.09.2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.