Case LawHigh Court › Itta/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itta/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gmr Vasavi Industries Limited

High Court 16 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gmr Vasavi Industries Limited
Date of order
16 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Itta/164/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Gmr Vasavi Industries Limited, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: Miscellaneous Petitions,if any, pending in this appeal shall stand disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.164 OF 2003 JUDGMENT:-(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order dated21.01.2003, passed by the Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) inI.T.A.No.1189/Hyd/1997. The point that arises for consideration is as to whether it wascompetent for the assessing officer to take steps under Section 143(1)(a) ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘the Act’), once an order was passed byhim under Section 143(3) of the Act, in respect of the same assessee and thesame assessment year. Heard Sri S.R. Ashok, learned Senior Counsel for the department andSri S. Ravi, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent. The question which we referred to above has been dealt with by us inI.T.T.A.No.32 of 2002. After taking the relevant provisions into account, wepassed an order dated 24.07.2014 holding that it is not competent for anassessing officer to take steps under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act once anorder was passed under Section 143(3) of the Act. Following the same, we dismiss the appeal. Miscellaneous Petitions,if any, pending in this appeal shall stand disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs. ____________________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date:16.09.2014Ks/gk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDYAND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.164 OF 2003 Date:16.09.2014 ks/gk
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan