Itta/164/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) v. Aditya Music ( Ltd)
High Court
16 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/164/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) v. Aditya Music ( Ltd)
Date of order
16 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/164/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Central ) v. Aditya Music ( Ltd), the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, as we do not find any elementof law for rendering decision. _____________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.164 OF 2013
Date: 16.07.2013
Between:
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),Hyderabad.
….Appellant
And
Aditya Music (India) Ltd.,
Hyderabad.
…Respondent
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No. 164 of 2013
ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
In terms of the earlier order, certified copy of the impugned order isfurnished and the same is kept on record.
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and gonethrough the impugned judgment and order of the learned Tribunal.
We find that the learned Tribunal while following its earlier decision,
on fact, came to the conclusion that the price paid for purchase of audiotracks and copyright thereof is treated as revenue expenditure.
In view of the aforesaid finding, which is based on accepted soundprinciple of law, we do not find any reason to interfere with the same.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, as we do not find any elementof law for rendering decision.
_____________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 16.07.2013KLP/ES
______________G. ROHINI, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.