Case LawHigh Court › Itta/169/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/169/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. State Bank Of Hyderabad

High Court 12 Mar 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/169/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. State Bank Of Hyderabad
Date of order
12 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/169/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. State Bank Of Hyderabad, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.169 of 2014 Date: 12-03-2014 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-III,Hyderabad .....Appellant AND State Bank of Hyderabad, Finance andAccounts Department, Hyderabad ...Respondent HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR I.T.T.A.No.169 of 2014 JUDGMENT:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta ) We have heard Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Counsel forthe appellant, and have gone through the judgment and order of thelearned Tribunal. It appears that the learned Tribunal has decided the matterholding that exercise of power under Section 263 of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 was not called for since the subject issue being adebatable one. This principle is very well settled and the wellsettled principle has been followed by the learned Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No order as tocosts. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed. ___________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ __________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 12-03-2014 Gsn
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan