Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd
High Court
13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 171 OF 2016
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act,1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.471lHydl2011 for assessment year 2005-06 dated 26.08.2015preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll,Hyderabad in lTA.Nos.O104/Clf(A)-lll/09-10 dated 12.01 .2O11 [preferred ]against theorder of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-1 (1), Hyderabad PAN/GlRNo. .
Between:
The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-1, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
AND
Mis. ADP P!'t. Ltd., 6-3-1091/C/1, Fortune 9, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad-500082
,..RESPONDENT/APPELLANT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR lT DEPT.Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Coud made the following: ORDER
--_,-
THE ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAI,,IANDTHE H( N BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI hI,\\II.)A
|TTA.NO.171 0F 2016
t:l R D E R (per the Hon'bte sri Justice Uiiat Bhuyan)
Heard Mr. B [,larasimha ]Sarma learned Standing Corrrsel for lncomeTax Department for ne appellant.
None appear: for the respondent
Mr. B.Narasir rha Sarma, learned Standing Counsel submits on thebasis of written ins'uctions dated 07.06.2022 thal the ap6,eal filed by theRevenue is required to be withdrawn as the issue is coverecl tnder'Vivad SeVishwas' scheme.
That being thr position, the related appeal is dismissed :n withdrawal
lnterlocutory r,pplications pending, if any, shall stand [(;losed. ]No orderas to costs.sD/- M.';,\NrfhEtTSm//TRUE coPY// -fu4\r-SE:CTION to",. llench 'A",n" Chairman' ln ;ome Tax Appellant Tribunal Hyderabac HYderabad' ,r Lr.d^r.la..r;,i1i1"ro*tiflffi*1li#T":'";iil'.i';"[ltdrterabad5. Two [CoPies]6. One [SPare ][CoPY]gbr\.
I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 13106,t',1022
ORDERITTA.No.171 o1'2016
DISMISSING T {E APPEALAS WITHDRAV /NWITHOUT CO:$ TS
t*)J )n
1t\[E, ][STAT€]ii,lii,o/,jIl lirrI I [t{l]\j ]2lr2?6)2'\,1,.'s!7
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.