Case LawHigh Court › Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd...

Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd

High Court 13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/171/2016 Of Comm Of Income Tax, Hyd v. M/S. Adp Pvt. Ltd., And Hyd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNETWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 171 OF 2016 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act,1961 against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A',]Hyderabad in lTA.No.471lHydl2011 for assessment year 2005-06 dated 26.08.2015preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lll,Hyderabad in lTA.Nos.O104/Clf(A)-lll/09-10 dated 12.01 .2O11 [preferred ]against theorder of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-1 (1), Hyderabad PAN/GlRNo. . Between: The Principal Commissioner of lncome Tax-1, Hyderabad. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT AND Mis. ADP P!'t. Ltd., 6-3-1091/C/1, Fortune 9, Raj Bhavan Road, Hyderabad-500082 ,..RESPONDENT/APPELLANT Counsel for the Appellant: SRI B. NARASIMHA SARMA, SC FOR lT DEPT.Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEAREDThe Coud made the following: ORDER --_,- THE ION'BLE SRI JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAI,,IANDTHE H( N BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI hI,\\II.)A |TTA.NO.171 0F 2016 t:l R D E R (per the Hon'bte sri Justice Uiiat Bhuyan) Heard Mr. B [,larasimha ]Sarma learned Standing Corrrsel for lncomeTax Department for ne appellant. None appear: for the respondent Mr. B.Narasir rha Sarma, learned Standing Counsel submits on thebasis of written ins'uctions dated 07.06.2022 thal the ap6,eal filed by theRevenue is required to be withdrawn as the issue is coverecl tnder'Vivad SeVishwas' scheme. That being thr position, the related appeal is dismissed :n withdrawal lnterlocutory r,pplications pending, if any, shall stand [(;losed. ]No orderas to costs.sD/- M.';,\NrfhEtTSm//TRUE coPY// -fu4\r-SE:CTION to",. llench 'A",n" Chairman' ln ;ome Tax Appellant Tribunal Hyderabac HYderabad' ,r Lr.d^r.la..r;,i1i1"ro*tiflffi*1li#T":'";iil'.i';"[ltdrterabad5. Two [CoPies]6. One [SPare ][CoPY]gbr\. I HIGH COURT DATED: 13106,t',1022 ORDERITTA.No.171 o1'2016 DISMISSING T {E APPEALAS WITHDRAV /NWITHOUT CO:$ TS t*)J )n 1t\[E, ][STAT€]ii,lii,o/,jIl lirrI I [t{l]\j ]2lr2?6)2'\,1,.'s!7
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan