Itta/17/2008 Of The Commissiosner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Sol Pharmaceuticals Limited
High Court
02 Feb 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/17/2008 Of The Commissiosner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Sol Pharmaceuticals Limited
Date of order
02 Feb 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/17/2008 Of The Commissiosner Of Income Tax-Iii v. M/S. Sol Pharmaceuticals Limited, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, all these appeals are dismissed. ___________________MADAN B.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURAND
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.Nos.16, 71, 88, 104, 105, 111 and 117 of 2001;
14 of 2002; 66 and 122 of 2003; 69 of 2004;150, 151, 152, 185, 199, 200, 256, 270, 315, 330, 380, 408, 644, 675,740, 753, 621, 775 and 789 of 2006;
42, 75, 128, 133, 164, 181, 247, 253 and 295 of 2007;
3, 17, 24, 165, 202, 233 and 305 of 2008;29, 67, 195, 202, 218, 220, 232, 364, 470, 477 and 484 of 2010;78 and 291 of 2011 & ITC.No.6 of 2002
DATED: 02.02.2012
ITTA.NO.16 OF 2001
Between
Commissioner of Income Tax,A.P.-I,Hyderabad … Appellant
And
Sri B.Nagendar … Respondent
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDHON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A.Nos.16, 71, 88, 104, 105, 111 and 117 of 2001;14 of 2002; 66 and 122 of 2003; 69 of 2004;150, 151, 152, 185, 199, 200, 256, 270, 315, 330, 380, 408, 644, 675,740, 753, 621, 775 and 789 of 2006;42, 75, 128, 133, 164, 181, 247, 253 and 295 of 2007;3, 17, 24, 165, 202, 233 and 305 of 2008;29, 67, 195, 202, 218, 220, 232, 364, 470, 477 and484 of 2010;78 and 291 of 2011 & ITC.No.6 of 2002
Common Order:(per Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
The tax effect in these cases is below Rs.1.00 lakh. Under the circumstances, we decline to entertain these appeals. Accordingly, all these appeals are dismissed.
___________________MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
___________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Dt: 02-02-2012
tnb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue