Case LawHigh Court › Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaia...

Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 06 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
1986-87
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

i IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 175 of 2008 Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A, Hyderabaddated 22/06/2007 passed in M.A. No.35/Hyd/07 in I.T.A No. 827/Hyd/2002 fortheAssessmentYear1986-87preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IV), Hyderabaddated09/07/2002passedin Appeal No.590/Antp/CIT(a)-IV/1999-00 for the Assessment Year1986-87 preferred against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, (Inv), Circle-1, Ananthapur passed in PAN/GIR No. V-203/1986-87, dated30/03/1993 for the Assessment Year 1986-87. Between: Somisetty Venkataramaiah (HUF),H.No.62/234, Fort,Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh ...Appellant AND The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-1, Kurnool. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant:Sri A.V. Krishna Kaundinya (NP) Counsel for the Respondent: Standing Counsel for Income Tax The Court made the following: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 175 of 2008 ORDER: - No representationfor theappellant. Thematterislisted in the weekly list. 2.The matter pertains to the year 2008. 3.In view of the above, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal is dismissed for “want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequelthereto,miscellaneouspetitions,if anypending, shall also stand closed. SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRARCPSECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A,Hyderabad.Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IV), Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (Inv), Circle-1, Ananthapur,AnanthapurBfetrict.AnanthapurBfetrict. 4. One CC to Sri A.V. Krishna Kaundinya, Advocate. High Court of A.P.,,.Amaravati (OPUC),.Amaravati (OPUC) 5. One CC to the Standing Counsel for Income Tax, High[Court][ of A.P.] 6. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P.at Amaravathi.7.Three CD Copies.7.Three CD Copies. MSR sree HIGH COURT DATED:10/11/2023 JUDGMENTITTA.No.175 of 2008 DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A. FOR WANTOF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS F^ c^11
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan