Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
06 Nov 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
06 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
1986-87
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/175/2008 Of Somisetty Venkataramaiah [Huf] v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARIAND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. RAVINDRA BABU
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 175 of 2008
Appeal under Section 260(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against theorder of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A, Hyderabaddated 22/06/2007 passed in M.A. No.35/Hyd/07 in I.T.A No. 827/Hyd/2002 fortheAssessmentYear1986-87preferredagainsttheorderoftheCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IV), Hyderabaddated09/07/2002passedin Appeal No.590/Antp/CIT(a)-IV/1999-00 for the Assessment Year1986-87 preferred against the order of the Assistant Commissioner of IncomeTax, (Inv), Circle-1, Ananthapur passed in PAN/GIR No. V-203/1986-87, dated30/03/1993 for the Assessment Year 1986-87.
Between:
Somisetty Venkataramaiah (HUF),H.No.62/234, Fort,Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh
...Appellant
AND
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-1, Kurnool.
...Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:Sri A.V. Krishna Kaundinya (NP)
Counsel for the Respondent: Standing Counsel for Income Tax
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No. 175 of 2008
ORDER: -
No representationfor theappellant. Thematterislisted in the weekly list.
2.The matter pertains to the year 2008.
3.In view of the above, the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal
is dismissed for “want of prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequelthereto,miscellaneouspetitions,if anypending, shall also stand closed.
SD/- P VENKATA RAMANAJOINT REGISTRARCPSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. The Registrar, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench-A,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals-IV), Hyderabad.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (Inv), Circle-1, Ananthapur,AnanthapurBfetrict.AnanthapurBfetrict.
4. One CC to Sri A.V. Krishna Kaundinya, Advocate. High Court of A.P.,,.Amaravati (OPUC),.Amaravati (OPUC)
5. One CC to the Standing Counsel for Income Tax, High[Court][ of A.P.]
6. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P.at Amaravathi.7.Three CD Copies.7.Three CD Copies.
MSR
sree
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/11/2023
JUDGMENTITTA.No.175 of 2008
DISMISSING THE I.T.T.A. FOR WANTOF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
F^ c^11
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.