Case LawHigh Court › Itta/176/2008 Of M/S Sri Balaji Trading...

Itta/176/2008 Of M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-V

High Court 06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/176/2008 Of M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-V
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itta/176/2008 Of M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income -Tax-V, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS INCOME TAX TRIBUN AL APPEAL NO: [176 ] [2008] Appeal under section 260-4 of the [lncome ][Tax ][Act-196't, against ][the]orders ilited: 15-09-2006 [passed ][in ][l.T.A.Nos. ][735lHydl2oO5 ][for ][Assessment]Year 1993-94 on the file of the Income [Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal ][Hyderabad ][Bench]'A', Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 28 03 20-05 [passed ]in [Ap-peal ][No.]0224&225tAcff-10(1)ClT(ar-V112004-OS [on the ][file ][of the ][Commissioner ][of ][lncome]Tax (Appeats) - Vl, 12th Floor, Gagan [Vihar, M.J.Road, Hyderabad preferred against]the Ordbr daied 31-03-1998 [passed ][in GIR ][No. 5-302, ][on ][the file ][of ][the ][Assistant]Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle [&(2) INV, ][Hyderabad.] Between: M/S Sri Balaji Trading Company, Secunderabad. ...APPELLANT AND The Commissioner of lncome [-Tax-V, Hyderabad. Andhra ][Pradesh] ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. [K.NEERAJA, Learned ][Counsel representing]SRI. K K VISWANATHAM Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following: ORDER THE HOBLE THE CHIEF IUSTICE AL KARADHEAND THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE I,SREENIVAS I.T.T.A.No .17 6 of 2008 UD MENT[(l'r ][rht ][l ][lc,,t'brz ][the ][ChieiJu:hv ][Alak ][Aradhe)] NIs. I.-.Neeraia, lcatned counsel represenring N'Ir. lt.I{.\/isuranatham, Iearned counsel f<>r [the]appellant/asserisee, submits that she has flo instrlrctions [to]argue the matt,3l 'fhe app,:al is, therefore, dismissed for non-proseculion No cos ts As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand clo sed Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAOJOINT REGISTRARt\JOINT REGISTRARt\. SECTIoN oFFIcER //TRUE COPY// To 1The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal Hyderabad Bench [,A,, ]Hyderabad.2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - Vl, j2th Floor, dagan Vihar,M.J.Road, Hyderabad.2The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - Vl, j2th Floor, dagan Vihar,M.J.Road, Hyderabad. J.The Assistant Cr:mmissioner of Income Tax Circle & (2) lNV, Hyderabad.4.One CC to SRl. K K VISWANATHAM, Advocate tOpUCI5Two CD Copies4.One CC to SRl. K K VISWANATHAM, Advocate tOpUCI5Two CD CopiesPR/gh Wx.-i1\ HIGH COURT DATED:061A112025 JUDGMENTITTA.No.176 of 2008 1r€,lI\rrl7-cJr.la5oa+,,r{(- DISMISSING FOR NON.PROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS \ry
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan