Itta/177/2008 Of M/S.sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/177/2008 Of M/S.sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/177/2008 Of M/S.sri Balaji Trading Company v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-V, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecutiofl.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYOERABAD
[ [34181]
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 177 OF 2008
Appeal under section 260-A of the lncome Tax [Act-1961, ][against ][the]orders dated: ['15-09-2006 ][passed ]in l.T.A.Nos. [734lHydl2005 ][for ][Assessment]Year 1992-93 on the file of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal [Hyderabad ][Bench]'A', Hyderabad preferred against the Order dated 28.03.2005 passed in Ap_peal No.O224&2251ACI-10(1)ClT(a)-V|12004-05 on the file of the [Commissioner ][of ][lncome]Tax (Appeals) - Vl, 12'n Floor, Gagan Vihar, M.J.Road, [Hyderabad preferred against]the Order dated 31-03-1998 [passed ][in ]GIR [No. ][5-302, ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][Assistant]Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle &(2) lNV, [Hyderabad.]Between:
M/s. Sri Balaji Trading Company, 5-5-65/3, Ranigunj, [Smunderabad]
...APPELLANT
AND
The Commissioner of lncome Tax-V, Hyderabad, [Andhra ][Pradesh]
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K.NEERAJA, [Learned Counsel ][representing]SRI. K K VISWANATHAM
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B
The Court made the following:
\
THE IION'BLE THE CHTEF IUSTIE AIOKARADHEAND
TIIIiHoN'BLE SRI USTICE I. REENIVRAO
INo.l08
JUDGMENT, f. >Lt rtc t Iott bte tt Chul lurtln Atlk Arntrh4
Ms. I(.Nceraja, learned counsel representing
NIr. I(.I(.Visrvanatham, Iearned counsel fcrr the
appellant/assessee, submits that she has no instructions toargue the mattcr.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecutiofl.
No costs.
As a se<1uel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand
closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA
JOINT REGISTRARLi.'{edrION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To
1The lncome Tax [Appellate Tribunal ][Hyderabad. ][Be1"ch ]['A', ][Hyderabad']2fne Commissioner'df [lncome Tax ][(Apfeals) ]- [Vl, ][12'n ][Floor, ][Gagan Vihar']M.J.Road, Hyderabad.2fne Commissioner'df [lncome Tax ][(Apfeals) ]- [Vl, ][12'n ][Floor, ][Gagan Vihar']M.J.Road, Hyderabad.3in" niiiiiurit Commissioner [of lncome Tax Circle &(2) lNV, ][Hyderabad'\.]4One CC to SRI K [VISWANATHAM' Advocate ] 5One CC to SRl. B NARASIMHA [SARMA' Advocate ] 6Two CD Copies4One CC to SRI K [VISWANATHAM' Advocate ] 5One CC to SRl. B NARASIMHA [SARMA' Advocate ] 6Two CD CopiesPrlghww
HIGH COURT
DATED:06 t01t2025
ORDER
lTTA.No.17T of 2OOB
DISMISSING THE ITTA
FOR NON.PROSECUTION
godgtAwTdfaq
-_:::: --1_:\,1 [l.; ][lr]i1o+J7-o10:i:r 2025pfA*t.sO..j [p/i ]i
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.