Itta/177/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Ii, Hyderabad v. M/S Gvk Biosciences Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad
High Court
24 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/177/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Ii, Hyderabad v. M/S Gvk Biosciences Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad
Date of order
24 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/177/2015 Of The Commr Of Income Tax-Ii, Hyderabad v. M/S Gvk Biosciences Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal filedthe Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular N 9 of +2024 d,ated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes win the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open toe Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFtELANGANA AT HYDERABADMONDAY ,THE TWENTY FqIURTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JI,]ISTICE P.SAM KOSHYTHE HoNoURABLE sRI JUSTII8INARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNALPEAL NO: 177 OF 2015
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under Sdtction 2604 of the lncome Tax Act,'1 96 1against the Order dated 02.08 2013 pas!ted in ITA NO.215lHyd/2012 for theAssessment Year 2005-2O06 on the file Qf the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal,Hyderabad Bench'B', Hyderabad.
Between:
THE COMMR OF INCOIUE TAX-II, H
DERABAD, Hyderabad
..APPELLANT
AND
M/S GVK BIOSCIENCES PW LTD.,HYDERABAD, [210, ][6-3-1192,]-Kundanbagh Begumpet, Hyderabad $00 [016]-Kundanbagh Begumpet, Hyderabad $00 [016]
..,RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI J V PRAD (SC FOR TNCOME TAX)
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI Y RATAKAR
The Court made the following: JUDGMEN
\
THE HONOURABLE [P.SAM ] ANDTHE HONOURABLE NANDIKONDA
ITTA No.l77 OF [2015]
JUDGMENT[(per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][{' ][Sam Koshy)]
Heard Ms. J. Sunitha, [leamed ][Junior ][Standing ][Counsel]Mr. [P. Murali ][Krishna, leamed Senior ][Standing]representing Counsel for the [lncome ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the ][appellant']Perused the record.
This appeal under [[Section 2604. ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax ][Act']][[Act']]
2. This appeal under [[Section 2604. ][of ][the ][Income ]][[of ][the ][Income ]][[the ][Income ]][[Income ]][[Tax ][Act']][[Act']]1961, has [been preferred ][by ][the ][Revenue ][as ][the ][appellant]against the order [dated ][02.08.2011i ][passed ][by ][the ][Income ][Tax]Appellate Tribunal, [Hyderabad ][Bench ]['B', ][Hyderabad' ][in]I.T.A.No.2l5lHydl2}l2 [for the ][Assessment ][Year ][2005-06']
3. Central Board of [Direct ][Taxes ][(CBDT) ][has issued ][Circular]No.9 of 2024 dated [17-09.2024' ][amending ][the previous Circular]No.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, [by further ][enhancing the monetary]limits for hling appeals [by ][the lncome ][Tax ][Department ][before ][the]Income Tax [Appellate Tribunals' High ][Courts and ][Supreme ][Court]
as a measure lor reducing litigati n. In paragraph 2 of the saidCircular, we find that the monearyl limit fixed for filing an appealbefore the High Court is Rs.2.00 cr redI
4. In the instant appeal, tax eIimit.
ct is well below the monetarv
5. Therefore, the appeal filedthe Department is dismissed interms of the aforesaid Circular N 9 of +2024 d,ated 17.09.2024.However, if the appeal comes win the exception of CircularNo.5 of 2024, it would be open toe Income Tax Department toseek revival of the appeal. ThereI be no order as to costs.
6. Consequently, miscellaneous pgtitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. MOHD.ISMAILDEPUW REGISTRAR
//rRUE CqPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Herabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad
2 One CC to SRl. J V PRASAD [(SC ]FOIR INCOME TAX) Advocate
3. One CC to SRl. Y RATNAKAR Advocfte
4. Two CD Copies
TPK/PSL
HIGH COURT
DATED:2410312025
JUDGMENTlTTA.No.177 ot 2015
ITTA IS DISMISSED
o.dafta"
-- i-\(o22 tljs zffi,.11,.,!\:
It
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.