Case LawHigh Court › Itta/178/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/178/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Challa Eswar Reddy

High Court 17 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/178/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Challa Eswar Reddy
Date of order
17 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/178/2003 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. Challa Eswar Reddy, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.178 of 2003 JUDGMENT:-(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 (for short, ‘the Act’) is filed against the order, dated19.11.2001, passed by the Hyderabad Bench ‘A’ of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.700/Hyd/1996. At the time of hearing the appeal, learned Senior StandingCounsel for the Revenue stated that the tax impact in this case isless than the limits stipulated under Section 268A of the Act. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order asto costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this appeal shall alsostand disposed of. _______________________ L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J Date:17.09.2014 ________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J kdl
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan