Case Law › High Court › Itta/179/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itta/179/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Hyderabad v. M/S.trinity Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd

High Court 01 Aug 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

01 Aug 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/179/2013 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Hyderabad v. M/S.trinity Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH ATHYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAAND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 179 of 2013 DATE: 01.08.2013 Between: Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad. … Appellant And M/s. Trinity Advanced Software Labs (P) Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Respondent This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU I.T.T.A. No. 179 of 2013 JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In spite of time given to the appellant to file certified copy by order,dated 03.07.2013, the same has not been furnished. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that he is not able to filethe certified copy. Therefore, the endorsement made by the registry that asper order, dated 03.07.2013, certified copy of the impugned order is filed, isincorrect. In view of the default clause quoted in the earlier order, dated03.07.2013, today the matter stands dismissed. However, this order will notdebar the appellant from taking steps in accordance with law. _____________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ________________ K. C. BHANU, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.