Case LawHigh Court › Itta/180/2013 Of Commissisoner Of Income...

Itta/180/2013 Of Commissisoner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.somani Brother

High Court 03 Jul 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/180/2013 Of Commissisoner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.somani Brother
Date of order
03 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itta/180/2013 Of Commissisoner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S.somani Brother, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is dismissed on the above said ground.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO.180 OF 2013 DATED:3.7.2013 Between:Commissioner of Income Tax – VIHyderabad … Appellant And M/s. Somani Brothers15-7-578, Begum BazarHyderabad … Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI I.T.T.A. NO.180 OF 2013 JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) The tax effect in this matter is less than Rs.10,00,000/- and asper the policy decision taken by the Department, no appeal underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be preferred if taxeffect is less than Rs.10,00,000/-. The appeal is dismissed on the above said ground. No order asto costs. ________________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ ______________________ G. ROHINI, J 3.7.2013 bnr
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan