Itta/188/2010 Of Infotech Enterprises Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHAINCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 1 88 oF2010 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ['A' ]Hyderabad in No.840/H/03 for assessment year 2000-2001 dated 29lO5l2OOg [preferred ]against theorder of the Commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals-lll) ][Hyderabad ][in ][Appeal]No.828/DCIT 2(4)lClT [(A)-lll/02-03 ]dated 28/03/2003 [preferred against the order of ][the]Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Cirlce-2(4) Hyderabad [dated ][30/01/2003 ][in]PAN/G lR No.AAACI 4487J/1 [-093] Betwee n:lnfotech Enterprises Limited,42, Nagarjuna Hills, Panjagutta, [Hyderabad, Rep. ][by ][its]Director, Smt B.Sucharitha ...A',ELLANTANDAssistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, Central Circle-S, [Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,]Hyderabad-50000'1 ...RES'.NDENT For the Appellant : SRI S.CHAKRAPANI, SRI CHALLA GUNARANJAN, Advocate For the Respondent : SMT MAMATHA, SENIOR I.T.DEPARTMENT The Court delivered the following: JUDG|\/ENT HONOURA.BLE AND HONOURABT,E [DR.JUSTICE ] I.T.T.A No.1 [88 ][0F ][201][ 0] JUDGMENT:[(P,?r ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][Uiial ][Bhuyan)] Heard Mr. [S.Chakrapani, ][leamed counsel ][representing]Mr.Challa [Gunaranjan, ][leamed counsel ][for ][the ][appellant ][and]Mrs.Mamatha, [leamed Senior Standing Counsel ][for ][the ][Income Tax]Depafiment [fbr ][the ][resPondent'] 2. Learned [counsel ][lbr ][the ][appellant ][submits ][that ][appellant ][has]opted for settlernent [under ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][scheme ][Therefore' ][in]terms of the [scheme, ][he ][is ][required ][to ][withdraw the ][appeal' ][Hence']the prayer tbr [u'ithdrawal of ][the ][appeal'] 3. We grant [liberty ][to ][the appellant ][to ][withdraw ][the ][appeal so ][as ][to]pursue the remedy [under the ][Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas ][scheme'] 4. The appeal is, [accordingly, ][disposed ][of'] 5. No costs. To Sd/-IV.SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRARq,SECTION OFFICER /iTRUE COPY// 1.The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'A' Hyderabad2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals-lll) Hyderabad.2.The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals-lll) Hyderabad. 2. aThe Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle-2(4), Hyderabad.4.One CC to Sri Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate (OPUC)One CC to Smt Vamatha, Sr. SC for l.T.Department (OPUC)One CC to Smt Vamatha, Sr. SC for l.T.Department (OPUC)6.Two CD Copies7.One Spare Cop'7 4. 6. 7. 7.Kjw HIGH COURTDATED:0211112021 JUDGMENTITTA.No.188 of 2010 DISPOSING OF THE I1-TA AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS. 1rE [3 ][re]14:Io^//i(ll)llL)) t$lJ"1)2tr/(.5l.?,/+\