In Itta/19/2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. Narpat Girji Constructions, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, we direct the registry notto accept any appeal if it is found on scrutiny that the certified copy of theimpugned order is underlined and marked and must return the same. ___________________ K.J.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. Nos. 18 AND 19 OF 2015
DATE: 25.03.2015ITTA.No.18 of 2015Between:Commissioner of Income Tax-II,Hyderabad.… PetitionerAndM/s. Goldstone Technologies Ltd.,Secunderabad.… Respondent
This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
I.T.T.A. Nos. 18 and 19 of 2015
COMMON ORDER:(Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta)
It appears from the record that the certified copies of the impugned orders havebeen underlined and marked by a person other than the Court.
Hence, on that ground alone we dismiss the appeals. However, liberty is givento the appellants to file fresh appeals with fresh certified copies.
It appears it is the regular feature of the revenue department that the appealsare being filed with underlined certified copies. Hence, we direct the registry notto accept any appeal if it is found on scrutiny that the certified copy of theimpugned order is underlined and marked and must return the same.
___________________
K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ
Date: 25.03.2015ES
___________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue