Itta/19/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Incometax-4 v. Smt. S. Uma Devi
High Court
03 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/19/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Incometax-4 v. Smt. S. Uma Devi
Date of order
03 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/19/2016 Of The Pr. Commissioner Of Incometax-4 v. Smt. S. Uma Devi, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAndTHE HON’BLE SRIJUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.38 of 2016IN/AND
I.T.T.A.No.19 of 2016
COMMON ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri J.V.Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax,submits I.T.T.A.M.P.No.38 of 2016 is filed seeking permission to withdrawthe main appeal as the tax effect involved in this matter is below themonetary limits prescribed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, videCircular No.21 of 2015, dated 10.12.2015.
Permission is accorded. I.T.T.A.M.P.No.38 of 2016 is disposed ofaccordingly.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petitionspending, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
03[rd] June, 2016.JSU
__________________________________
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANAnd
THE HON’BLE SRIJUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
JSU
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.38 of 2016IN/ANDI.T.T.A.No.19 of 2016
Date: 03.06.2016
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue