Itta/193/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Kasila Farm Limited
High Court
07 Sep 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/193/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Kasila Farm Limited
Date of order
07 Sep 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itta/193/2008 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax -Ii v. Kasila Farm Limited, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD -
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL AP PEAL NO: 193 OF 2008
llncLrrnc'l rrr lrrhLrnll \lrpcll L.ntlcr Scetiorr l(r0 .\ ot'll:c Irreonrc llrr.,\et. li-glLinsl lhc(rr(l(r (rl llrc lrcorne lur \plr.llltc lrihLrnrrl. llYdcrlrhlrri llcnch' ..\ '. Ilr,,ier.lrl.,rtl tn ll \ \,r6S0 'llvrl 1001 Iirr ilsscsslltrtlt YeuI l()()S -t)t) rlltcrl l-s-0-.1-l(X).i lrfclct.rc(l itsltinsl lltc ()r(lcrol tlte [( ]onttrtissiotrer ot IneorrcTar 1Appcnls III )ll),dcrabad irr.\ppell \o. 1.1 JtSIl.l ( lT'(,\) III 0l-01 <latcrl li-ll-2{)01 prclirTcti agail)st thc (lrder ol'lhc ,\riclitionrrl ( (r'nnrissi(,f(r (,1
I|rc.rnc l'ar ( ASSTS ) SPh('IAL ItANCIE -2. IIYI)ER.{BAD dalc(l lS-01-1001 i, I)..\\ (itR\o. K-li l)
Between:
The Commissioner of lncome Tax -ll, Hyderabad.AND
...APPELLANT
Kasila Farm Limited, 1-8-439,Street No.3, Lane No.1, lndian Airlines Colony,Begumpet, Hyderabad.Begumpet, Hyderabad.
.,.RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: SMT K. MAMATA CHOUDARY
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI S. RAVI
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICESRI M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
I.T.T.A. No.193 oF 2008
JUDGMENT
the Acting Chief Justice Si M.S.Ramecho.nclra Raa)
Learned counsei for the appellant seeks permission tourthdraw the appeal with liberty to the appellant to revive theappeal in the event it does not get favourable relief under theDiltrct ['l'ax ]\,'it acl sc Vishu as Scherne. 2020.urthdraw the appeal with liberty to the appellant to revive theappeal in the event it does not get favourable relief under theDiltrct ['l'ax ]\,'it acl sc Vishu as Scherne. 2020.
l. ilavrng r-cgarcl to the saicl plea. this l.l-TA rs <li:;nttssecl asri rthclrirrr n ir ith libe rtv as prtu..eri lbr.
Pt r-rding rniscellancous petitions, if ar-r-r., in this appealshall also stand dismissecl.shall also stand dismissecl.
SD/- M. SANTHI VARDHANIJOINT REGISTRARGoSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A, Hyderabad2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals - lll), Hyderabad.3. The Additional Commissioner of lncome tax (Assts)-special Range-2,Hyderabad.4. One CC to SN/T. K,MAMATA CHOUDARY, Advocate tOpUCl
5 One CC to Sri. S. Ravi, Advocate
6. Two CD Copies
k LrlI l-)$.-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0710912021
E [iA,](i.r?.ir{cORDER{:..ITTA.No.193 of 2008d [rZl ][SiP2021]Ia\4r"*3+*.i
DISMlSSING THE ITTA,AS WITHDRAWN.
Vr,\b\lx\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.