Itta/193/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
06 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/193/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
06 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/193/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY. THE SIXTH DAY OF APRILTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
l.T.T.A. NO: 193 OF 2018
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'A' Hyderabad in ITANo.547lHyd/2017 for assessment year 2008-2009 dated 29111t2017 preferred againstthe order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Apepals)-8 Hyderabad, AppealNo.0515/ClT(A)-8lHydl2014-15 dated 07/03/2017 preferred against the order of theAdditional Commissioner of lncome Tax (TDS) TDS Range-2, Hyderabad PAN/GIRNo.HYDU00425P dated 23.2.1 5
Between:USHODAYA ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, Eenadu Building, Ramoji Film City ,Anazpur (Village), Ranga Reddy District50l 512
,..APPELLANTAND
Dy. COMMISSIONER OF INCOIUE TAX [(TDS), ]TDS Circle 2(1), [lT ][Towers, ] [C]Guards, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI C.V.NARASIMHAM, [Advocate]For the Respondent : SRI [S'RAVI, ][Advocate]The Court made the [following: ORDER]
THE [M'S'RAMACHANDRA ]
AND
THE [T' ]
t.T.1 3o[f2][018]
NT:[(Per ][Hon'ble ][Sri ][Justice ][M'S' ][Ramachandra Rao)]
Learned [counsel ][for ][appellant ][se'eks ][to ][withdraw ][this Appeal to]ach the [respondents under the ][Direct ][Taxes ][(Vivad ][Se ][Vishwas)]approAct,2020.
Having [regard ][to ][the ][said submission' ][this ][appeal ][is ][dismissed]as withdrawn, [with ][liberty ][to ][approach ][this ][Court in the ][event there ][is]no resolntion [of ][the ][dispute ][of ][the ][petlttoner][ with ][the ][DePartment]under [the ][said ][Act' ][No ][costs']
As a sequel, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending, ][if ][any, ][shall ][stand]
To
closed.
Sd/-K.S
JOINT RSECTION
,TRUE
o' H vd [e ][ra ][b ][ad]
I &,?'33 [".Ti6 [o:fi ][:l'*i,*'#:i!'HX?:iBsffi ]["n' ]a. 5;; 6c i; [sii ][S.Ravi, Advocate ][(oPUc)]4. Two [Copies]
Kj
rry
DATED:06/04/2021
ORDERITTA.No.193 of 2018
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA,
I
1t1SI€Joo27APHm21a*
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.