Itta/193/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Incometax - I v. Kimidi Surapu Naidu Jute Twine Industries Pvt., Ltd
High Court
06 Nov 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Itta/193/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Incometax - I v. Kimidi Surapu Naidu Jute Twine Industries Pvt., Ltd
Date of order
06 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/193/2019 Of Principal Commissioner Of Incometax - I v. Kimidi Surapu Naidu Jute Twine Industries Pvt., Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR&HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A. No. 193 of 2019
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C. Praveen Kumar)
The learned Standing Counsel for the Income-Tax Department would submit that in terms of the Central Board Direct Taxes Circular No.17 of 2019, dated 08.08.2019, all appeals where the tax effect is below Rs.1,00,00,000/- are required to be withdrawn and as the value of the present appeal is less than Rs.1,00,00,000/-, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel would further submit that liberty may be granted in case it were to be found later that the subject matter of the appeal falls within the exceptions mentioned in the Circular issued by the Central Board to file an application for restoration of the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforestated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall disposed of as infructuous.
____________________
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J
06.11.2019
__________________
J. UMA DEVI, J
bcj
bcj
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR & HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A. No. 193 of 2019
06.11.2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.