Itta/194/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
High Court
06 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Itta/194/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
06 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itta/194/2018 Of Ushodaya Enterprises Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
H,GH COURT FOR THE ST
STAI HYDERfJiDOF
IYiS_DAY. [rHE ][srxrH ]DAY OF APRrLTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
DRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SR' M.S.RAMACHANDRA "'U911CC RAO"'U911CC RAOTHE HoNouRor,-= r$IorarcE T.vrNoD KUMAR
I.T,T.A. NO:1 940 F 2018
rncome Tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the rncome Tax Act, againstthe order of the rncome Tax Apperate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad, in rrANo 546/Hyd/2017 for Assessment year 2008-09 dared 29r11r17 preferred against theOrder of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals-B), Hyderabad, AppealNo.lrA05'12/clr(A)-Br1ydl2o14-15 dated 0610312017 preferred against the order of theNo.lrA05'12/clr(A)-Br1ydl2o14-15 dated 0610312017 preferred against the order of theDy.Commissioner of lncome Tax,TDS Circle-2(1) Hyderabad, PAN/GtRNo. HYDU00425F dated 20 tO2t2O1 s
Between:
USHODAYA ENTERPRTSES.PRTVATE LrMrrED, Eenadu Buirding, Ramoji Firm cityAnazpur (Vittage) Ranga Reddy Oistrict_SOi SiZ
...APPELLANT
AND
DY. COMMISSIONER OF TNCOME TAX (TDS), TDS Circte 2 (1), ff Towers,A.C.Guards, Hyderabad.A.C.Guards, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
For the Appellant : SRI C.V.NARASIMHAM, Advocate
For the Respondent : SRI A.RADHA KRISHNA, Advocate SC for 1.T.,
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
THE HONOURABLE [M.S.RAMACHANDRA ]
A:,,1D
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE 1" ]
I.T.T.A.No.l94 of 2018
JUDGMENT : [(Per ]Hon'ble Sri [Justice ][M.S. ][Ramachandra Rao)]
Leamed counsel for appellant seeks to [withdraw this ][Appeal to]approach the respondents under the Direct Taxes [(Vivad ]Se Vishwas)4c1,2020.
Having regard to the said submission, this appeal is dismissedas withdrawn, with liberty to approach this Court in the event there isno resoiution of the dispute of the petitioner with the Departmentunder the said Act. No costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed
Sd/.K.SREENIVASA RAOJolNr //rRUE coPYt ffipRARSECTION OFFICER
To2. 1. TheOnelncome Tax Appellate Tritrunal, Hyderabad Bench ,A, Hyderabad.99 1o 9ri [C.V.Narasimham, ][Rdvotate ][(bCUC)'-" ]['' ]['']4. 3. TwoOneCD !! [t_o ]Copies[sf ][A.Radha Krishna, ]Adv;;te iobJdiKj
\..
HIGH DATED:06/04/2021
ORDERITTA.No.194 of 2018
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN THE ITTA,N$>\\)A+
g STAft,1:)cr)2l [APfl ][20?1]):,,.-a:i,r-i\\_--?
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.